Rodocanalis

Taxonavigation

Ichnogenus: †Rodocanalis
Ichnospecies: †R. geometricus – †R. linearis – †R. reticulatus – †R. runicus

Name

Rodocanalis Schloz, 1972

Type ichnospecies: Rodocanalis reticulatus Schloz, 1972, by original designation.

Note: Most recently interpreted as a bioclaustration (cecidotaxon) as of Wisshak et al. (2023); originally interpreted as a bioerosion trace fossil (ichnotaxon).

Synonymy

• Runia Marek, 1982 [syn.: Wisshak et al., 2023]
  • Type ichnospecies: Runia runica Marek, 1982.

References

Primary references

• Marek, J. 1982. Runia runica ichnogen. et ichnosp. nov., a new sponge boring from the Silurian of Bohemia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica 4: 401–408. [not seen]
• Schloz, W. 1972. Zur Bildungsgeschichte der Oolithenbank (Hettangium) in Baden-Württemberg. Arbeiten aus dem Institut für Geologie und Paläontologie an der Universität Stuttgart 67: 101–212. [not seen]
• Wisshak, M., Schneider, S., Mikuláš, R., Richiano, S., Ramil, F. & Wilson, M.A. 2023. Putative hydroid symbionts recorded by bioclaustrations in fossil molluscan shells: a revision and reinterpretation of the cecidogenus Rodocanalis. Papers in Palaeontology 9(2): e1484. DOI: 10.1002/spp2.1484 . Reference page. 

Additional references

• Häntzschel, W.(†) 1975. Trace Fossils and Problematica. Second Edition (Revised and Enlarged). Pp. W1–W269. In: Moore, R.C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W, Miscellanea, Supplement 1. Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas. DOI: 10.17161/tip.v0i0.5426 . Reference page. 
• Wisshak, M., Knaust, D. & Bertling, M. 2019. Bioerosion ichnotaxa: review and annotated list. Facies 65(2): article 24 [1–39]. DOI: 10.1007/s10347-019-0561-8 . Reference page.